If you need HELP, SUPPORT or just have a GDPR question please call +44 (0) 208 133 2545 or email us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Alternatively please visit our contact page
FREE GDPR Helpline
Call +44 (0) 208 133 2545
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The EU-US Privacy Shield is a framework for transatlantic exchanges of personal data for commercial purposes between the European Union and the United States. One of its purposes is to enable US companies to more easily receive personal data from EU entities under EU privacy laws meant to protect European Union citizens. The EU-US Privacy Shield is a replacement for the International Safe Harbor Privacy Principles which were declared invalid by the European Court of Justice in October 2015.
In October 2015 the European Court of Justice declared the previous framework called the International Safe Harbor Privacy Principles invalid. Soon after this decision the European Commission and the U.S. Government started talks about a new framework and on 2 February 2016 they reached a political agreement. The European Commission published a draft “adequacy decision”, declaring principles to be equivalent to the protections offered by EU law.
The Article 29 Data Protection Working Party delivered an opinion on April 13, 2016, stating that the Privacy Shield offers major improvements compared to the Safe Harbour decisions, but that three major points of concern still remain. They relate to deletion of data, collection of massive amounts of data, and clarification of the new Ombudsperson mechanism. The European Data Protection Supervisor issued an opinion on 30 May 2016 in which he stated that “the Privacy Shield, as is stands, is not robust enough to withstand future legal scrutiny before the [European] Court”.
On 8 July 2016 EU Member States representatives (article 31 committee) approved the final version of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, paving the way for the adoption of the decision by the Commission. The European Commission adopted the framework on 12 July 2016 and it went into effect the same day.
German MEP Jan Philipp Albrecht and campaigner Max Schrems have criticized the new ruling, with the latter predicting that the Commission might be taking a “round-trip to Luxembourg” (where the European Court of Justice is located). EU Commissioner for Consumers, Vera Jourova, expressed confidence that a deal would be reached by the end of February. Many Europeans are demanding a mechanism for individual European citizens to lodge complaints over the use of their data, as well as a transparency scheme to assure that European citizens data does not fall into the hands of U.S intelligence agencies. The Article 29 Working Party has taken up this demand, and stated it will hold back another month until March 2016 to decide on consequences of Commissioner Jourova’s new proposal.
The European Commission’s Director for Fundamental Rights Paul Nemitz stated at a conference in Brussels in January how the Commission would decide on the “adequacy” of data protection. The Economist newspaper predicts that “once the Commission has issued a beefed-up ‘adequacy decision’, it will be harder for the ECJ to strike it down”. Privacy activist Joe McNamee summed up the situation by noting the Commission has announced agreements prematurely, thus forfeiting its negotiating right. At the same time, the first court challenges in Germany have commenced: the Hamburg data protection authority was during February 2016 preparing to fine three companies for relying on Safe Harbour as the legal basis for their transatlantic data transfers and two other companies were under investigation. From the other side a reaction looks imminent.
As of February 2017 the future of the Privacy Shield is contested. One consultant, Matt Allison, predicts that “The EU’s citizen-driven, regulated model will swiftly come into conflict with the market forces of the US and the UK.” Allison summarizes a new paper in which the European Commission lays out its plans for adequacy decisions and global strategy.
Hi, іts pleasant artiсle regarding media print, we all be familiar
wіth media iѕ a enormous sourcｅ of facts.
Spot on with this write-uⲣ
Youｒ stʏle is unique in comparison to other folks I hаve read stuff from.
I appreciate you for posting when you һave the opportunity, Gսess I’lⅼ juѕt
bookmark this web site.
This post offers clear idea for the new visitors of blogging, that truly how to do
Ӏf some οne needs еxpert view regarding running a blog then i suggest hіm/hеr to pay a quick visit tһis webpage, Keep up the good
Hey tһere! I’m at worҝ surfing aгound your bⅼog from my new iphone!
Just wanted to say I lovе reading your blog and look fοrward to all your posts!
Keep սр the ｅxcellent work!
Tһis іnformation is invaluable. Whеre can I find oսt
Verʏ good poѕt! We will be linking to this great content
on our website. Kеep up the great writing.
Admiring the time and effort you put into your website and
detailed information you provide. It’s nice to come across a blog every
once in a while that isn’t the same unwanted rehashed information. Excellent read!
I’ve saved your site and I’m including your RSS feeds to my
I’m impressed, I must say. Rarely do I come
across a blog that’s equally educative and amusing, and without a doubt, you have
hit the nail on the head. The problem is an issue that
not enough people are speaking intelligently about.
I’m very happy that I found this in my search
for something concerning this.