If you need HELP, SUPPORT or just have a GDPR question please call +44 (0) 208 133 2545 or email us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Alternatively please visit our contact page
FREE GDPR Helpline
Call +44 (0) 208 133 2545
Next year, 25 May looks like being a significant date. That’s because it’s the day that the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) comes into force.
Not enough companies understand how to properly delete the data they hold, and need to address this if they are to comply with new data protection rules, privacy and security experts have said.
Under incoming UK and European regulations, firms will be required to completely remove all the data they hold on an individual if that person requests it. They’ll also be asked to prove they’ve properly wiped their records. This goes further than existing “right to be forgotten” rules, and there are concerns that organisations are unaware of, and unprepared for, the complexities of the new laws.
“I’m astounded by how little is known and understood about data sanitisation,” said Richard Stiennon, chief strategy officer of the Blancco Technology Group.
First things first. Unlike much of the legislation that emerges from Brussels, the GDPR is a regulation rather than a directive.
This means that it becomes law in all EU countries at the same time; a directive, in contrast, allows each country to decide how its requirements are to be incorporated in national laws.
Second, the purpose of the new regulation is to strengthen and rationalise data protection for all individuals within the EU. It also covers the export of personal data to outside the bloc.
Its aims are to give control back to EU residents over their personal data and to simplify the regulatory environment for international business by unifying regulation, so that instead of having to deal with a range of data-protection issues in different jurisdictions, companies will effectively be able to obtain a “passport” for the entire region, much as financial services firms have been able to acquire.
Given that the use, abuse and exploitation of personal data has become the core business of the Internet, anything that affects this is going to be a big deal. The GDPR extends EU data-protection law to all foreign companies that process the data of EU residents.
So even if a company has no premises or presence within the EU, if it processes EU data it will be bound by the regulation. And the penalties for non-compliance or infringement are eye-watering, even by Internet standards: fines up to €20m and/or 4% of global turnover.
The GDPR applies both to data “controllers” (who determine how and why personal data is processed) and “processors” (who handle the data on the controller’s behalf). The obligations on controllers are broadly similar to those imposed by current data-protection law.
But if you’re a processor, then the regulation imposes specific legal obligations on you to maintain records of personal data and processing activities and you will have significantly more legal liability if you are responsible for a data breach. And any breach, no matter how small, has to be reported to the authorities within 72 hours.
More significantly, the GDPR extends the concept of “personal data” to bring it into line with the online world. The regulation stipulates, for example, that an online identifier, such as a device’s IP address, can now be personal data.
So next year, a wide range of identifiers that had hitherto lain outside the law will be regarded as personal data, reflecting changes in technology and the way organisations collect information about people.
The regulation gives important new rights to citizens over the use of their personal information. They have the right, for example, to contest and fight decisions that have been made about them by algorithms processing their data.
Valid consent has to be explicitly obtained for any data collected and for the uses to which it will be put. Consent for children’s data must be given by parents or guardians and data controllers must be able to prove that consent has been obtained.
Citizens will now have the right to request the deletion of personal information related to them, and companies will have to be able to prove that the offending data has been properly wiped (which may be more difficult than it sounds). And so on.
For many traditional companies, the ones that keep HR records, customer lists, contact details etc, the GDPR will probably make little practical difference, except for more onerous compliance requirements
But for organisations that have hitherto operated outside the reach of data-protection law, for example the hidden multitudes of data-hucksters, trackers, data-auctioneers and ad-targeters that operate behind the facade of websites, social media and Google, the GDPR represents an existential threat.
Facebook and Google should be OK, because they claim to have the “consent” of their users.
But the data-broking crowd do not have that consent. As Advertising Age puts it:
“Targeting and tracking companies will need to get user consent somehow. Everything that invisibly follows a user across the internet will, from May 2018, have to pop up and make itself known in order to seek express permission from individuals.”
The new regulation will, it concludes, “rip the global digital ecosystem apart”.
The original article (and image) was originally posted here: https://www.cybersecurityintelligence.com/blog/online-privacy-makes-a-gdpr-comeback-2733.html